Sign up for our newsletters   

Baltimore City Paper home.
Print Email

The Mail

Clean Water Costs

Posted 6/17/2009

Baltimore, like many U.S. cities, faces the daunting challenge of maintaining a sewer system that is more than 100 years old in some parts of town ("The Reek Goes On," Mobtown Beat, June 10). No one likes the sight and smell of polluted water, and cleaning up our precious waterways is not just about public health and the environment, but about economic prosperity. The problem of aging infrastructure in our cities is compounded by a growing population, a decline in federal funding to help pay for infrastructure improvements, new regulatory requirements, and the threat of climate change, which could mean more storms and more water in an already overburdened system. Ratepayers in Baltimore, as in most U.S. cities, will foot most of the bill to upgrade its vast network of pipes and other infrastructure to prepare for these challenges. The National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) views the $4 billion in federal stimulus funding for clean water, of which Maryland received its $122 million share, as an important first step. While this amount helps, it simply is not enough.

Right now, the United States faces a water and wastewater infrastructure-funding CRISIS. The Environmental Protection Agency, the Government Accountability Office, the Water Infrastructure Network, and others estimate a wastewater funding gap of $350 billion to $500 billion over the next 20 years. Consider this: The federal government covered 78 percent of the cost to finance wastewater infrastructure in the 1970s; and now, less than 5 percent--a drop in the storm drain, as it were. The amount cities pay--about $70 billion annually--for their water and wastewater needs is second only to their education costs, according to the U.S. Census.

To help address the funding problem, NACWA and others support a clean water trust fund, financed broadly by fees potentially on such things as bottled beverages, flushable products, pesticides and agricultural chemicals, and pharmaceuticals, providing about $10 billion annually to help cities cover the staggering cost of meeting their water quality objectives. Even with this additional funding, ratepayers will still cover the lion's share of clean water costs. We hope to see a bill introduced soon in Congress that would create such a trust fund. We have trust funds for airports and highways. Why not create one to ensure we have clean water? Without significant federal assistance, the reek will go on.

Ken Kirk
Executive director, National Association of Clean Water Agencies
Washington, D.C.

White Empowerment vs. Black Empowerment

In the May 27 issue of City Paper, there is a cover photo and story about Red Emma's' efforts to organize a free school ("Working Class," The Arts, May 26). However, in the Mobtown Beat section of the same issue, there is a story about The Black Book: Empowering Black Families and Communities ("The Black Book"). Unfortunately, because black folks in prison are often tagged as "gang members" and therefore criminal and bad, books written to empower their people are considered dangerous and a recruitment tool for violence. Yet when white anarchists want to start a free school to empower their community, it is treated as something we should all support and in a much more positive light.

I think the intention of City Paper was to expose both stories in a way that was quite objective, but I want to call attention to how empowerment and education are treated differently in our society when led by different groups. Racism, I would say. 

Laurie Bezold

Editor Lee Gardner responds: The Black Book's empowerment value aside, we wrote about it in this instance because its publication was alleged in federal indictments to have helped fund the Black Guerrilla Family's illegal activity. If Red Emma's comes under similar charges, we'll be on it.

Correction: Due to a fact-checking error, last week's Councilmania (June 10) misreported that Council President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake (D) was not present for the June 1 vote on One on One trash service and that Councilwoman Rochelle "Rikki" Spector (D-5th District) was among the "yes" votes. In fact, Rawlings-Blake was present and voted "yes," and Spector was absent. City Paper regrets the error.

Clarification: In last week's Curtain Time (Stage, June 10), we failed to credit the photo of Wittenberg actor Seth Reichgott. The photo was taken by Brad Cartwright.

Related stories
Comments powered by Disqus
CP on Facebook
CP on Twitter