Sign up for our newsletters   

Baltimore City Paper home.
Print Email

Big Books Intro

In Praise of Indecency

Smut--Still Dirty After All These Years

Mel Guapo
If you prefer, you may read this article in its original form.

Big Books Issue 2006

In Praise of Indecency Smut--Still Dirty After All These Years

The Trail-Blazer Barney Rosset's Grove Press Paved the Way for Literate, Intelligent, Risk-Taking Book Publishing | By Byron Coley

The Reigning Queen Editor Dian Hanson Navigates the Fine Line Separating Art from Pornography | By Bob Massey

The New World Finding Your Own Personal Way Amid the Greatest Porn-Delivery System Ever Invented | By Rahne Alexander

The Good Parts Finding My Place In The World By Writing Erotica | By Petula Caesar

The Un-Speakable Exploring the Work of Splatterspunk Author Edward Lee | By Tim Kreider

The Books Reading Smut from the 1950ís to the Present | By Wendy Ward

The Right Now Alan Moore was one of the first to introduce realistic sex into traditionally juvenile genres. He ha... | By Tim Kreider

Posted 9/27/2006

This past February USA Today made the startling observation that "mainstream bookstores also are finding erotica attractive." The Feb. 21 article, titled "Romance novels for women get frankly sexual," also claims that--youíll be shocked to discover, no doubt--customers buying such books donít fit a stereotype. Now, noticing the so-called mainstreaming of porn has been going on now for a few years; ditto the fact that almost everybodyís credit card record probably has some evidence of a naughty purchase on it somewhere. But if there is any bigger evidence that America is finally admitting that it thinks a good deal about fucking than it being written about in the USfreakingA Today, people, we donít know what it is.

With this yearís Big Books Issue weíd like to join the ranks of the people who, quite frankly, feel that pornography is getting way too acceptable. Not biting any feeding hands here. Given that "nonsexual" ads help publish this very paper, weíre not saying that itís wrong, amoral, or whatever. Weíre merely taking umbrage at the fact that good, old-fashioned filth is in danger of losing its uncleanliness.

Fortunately, smut retains the fleshy messiness that long ago got tanned, waxed, toned, and bleached out of pornography. Classic smut--from Victorian spanking novels to todayís gadget-happy leather escapade serials--makes room for all body and kink types. It even sounds and looks blunter than the scientificish "pornography": smut--U sandwiched in between S&M and a cross.

Smut, however, isnít less socially acceptable erotica. Smut welcomes all those things that donít get talked about in polite society, be they transgressive, subcultural, politically radical, druggy, personally candid, or just odd. Itís a literary grab bag best represented by Grove Pressí output out from the 1950s to the early 1970s. In this issue, Byron Coley profiles Barney Rosset, the man behind Grove Pressí remarkably fecund years. Elsewhere, Bob Massey talks to Dian Hanson, the sex editor of lavish lifestyle coffee-table books imprint Taschen Books. Rahne Alexander surfs through the online explosion of queer/sex-positive smut. Local African-American erotica novelist Petula Caesar writes about being a black woman writing about sex. Timothy Kreider explores the unsettling world of splatterspunk author Edward Lee; Kreider also dives into The Lost Girls, the new erotic comic-book opus from Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie. And Wendy Ward reports back from a week shacked up with a stack of one-handed reads, during which times she laughed, got a little exhausted, and maybe even got a bit turned on.

Such is smutís gift--it offers more than a means to come. Not even pornography is that giving of itself. In fact, about all the mainstreaming of porn has achieved is successfully turning peopleís sex lives into marketing niches to be satisfied with more products. Whether it be a mature, European BBW smoking cigarettes or an oral-friendly amateur Asian shemale, there is somebody, out there, willing to take your money to give you that and nothing more.

Smut isnít just about making the proverbial buck; it always offers something more. Itís funny. Itís psychologically probing. Itís bizarre. Itís unsettling. Itís decadent. Itís narratively inventive. Itís surreal. Itís dangerous. Itís scary. It may even be titillating. Sometimes your response to it is so visceral that it reminds you why it used to be kept behind the counter and wrapped in brown paper. It makes you feel dirty--and, really now, why is feeling dirty supposed to be a bad thing in the first place?

Related stories

Big Books Intro archives

More Stories

Going Short (9/23/2009)
Some authors simply prefer compact storytelling over the novel's wordy road

Let's Get Short (9/23/2009)
City Paper's Big Books Issue 2009 takes a look at fiction's overlooked gems

Neverending Stories (9/23/2009)
Short stories continue to be where sci-fi writers explore their big ideas

Comments powered by Disqus
CP on Facebook
CP on Twitter